fbpx

 

Hello,

I was considering to have my 500 hours (3d generation) crank overhauled by a sled or bike workshop , and was considering to upgrade using components from the best known among rotax series for reliability , 717/720 sled engine

PIN LENGTH 52.90 // 52MM (582)
BIG END BORE 33.00 // (31mm 1st gen 582 , 33mm 3d generation?)
PIN DIAMETER 26.00 =
BIG END WIDTH 18.00 =
SMALL END BORE 24.00 22MM (582)
BIG END BEARING26X33X18 26X32X18 ?
SMALL END WIDTH 18.00 =
CENTER TO CENTER 125.00MM =
WASHER THICKNESS 1 =
SMALL END BEARING 20X24X24 18X22X22 TO BE CHANGED TO 18X24X(22??) 3MM ROLLERS



3 832 209 BALL BRG 6206 N TVH C4 30-62-16
10 832 231 BALL BRG 6207 N TNH C3 35-72-17
2 center bearing 6206 N TVH C3? C4 ?


for comparison , old 582 version

MODELCONNECTING RODPIN LENGTH51.90
BIG END BORE31.00PIN DIAMETER24.00
BIG END WIDTH16.90
SMALL END BORE22.00
BIG END BEARING24X31X17
SMALL END WIDTH16.90
CENTER TO CENTER125.00MM
WASHER THICKNESS1
SMALL END BEARING18X22X22
  • Re: 582 crankshaft overhaul

    by » 10 years ago


    Hi someone ;)

    I'm about to assemble with crankshaft modified from 3d generation , but with 720 conrod kit
    that implies that top end bearing will change
    from 18x22x23 --> 18x24x24 , that's the closest I found
    (09263-18015 - RN 18x24x24 suzuki DT40 outbord .. I notice it is less powerfull per cylinder than 582)
    No cageless in this dimension , or I have to make one (I don't know the rules for this : number of rollers? space between..)
    What I found is some load values
    18x22x17 load 11.9 17.6 (dynamic / static )
    18x24x12 12.15 14.15
    18x24x20 20 26.5
    18x24x20 17.9 22.4 (other brand)
    which leaves me optimistic ...

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.