Re: Current 912uls prop reviews
by Roger Lee » one month ago
I wonder if the E-Prop doesn't do well with higher HP? I don't know. Maybe a good question to direct at E-Prop folks.
Roger Lee
LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
520-349-7056 Cell
Re: Current 912uls prop reviews
by Byron Mills » 6 weeks ago
Looking at E-props website the Glorieuse-3 C9 is specifically designed for 915 and 916 engines. Edge Performance also fit E-props to their EP 918Ti engine that does 185hp, as you say best to contact E-prop if having an issue.
Re: Current 912uls prop reviews
by Sean Griffin » 6 weeks ago
Seems to me that a ground adjustable prop will always be the best option, as the pilot/maintainer can make incremental small adjustments to maximise his/her mission objectives, for that particular aircraft.
E-prop has a strong following in Australia (no experience myself). I have heard that pilot/maintainers who do not follow, the factory recommended pitch settings, always regret their failure to do so.😈
|
To receive critical-to-safety information on your ROTAX Engine, please subscribe to |
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. This decision can be reversed.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
