by itemprop='name' » 3 years ago
by Tyler Hathaway » 3 years ago
The 914 has extra complexity (more points of failure, as seen above), greater weight (16 lbs), and greater cost (about 60% more!) than the 912 ULS. The 912 ULS, a newer design, has nearly equivalent power, except at higher altitudes, or for the 5 minutes you are allowed to go past the detent and go "full turbo" (115hp) on the 914. Since I don't often fly at high altitudes, or on short fields, it was an easy choice for me.
by itemprop='name' » 3 years ago
I always thought the lower compression of the 914 would make it more reliable in spite of the turbo. I guess I was wrong.
To receive critical-to-safety information on your ROTAX Engine, please subscribe to |
ROTALK NEWS Episode 5
Rotax-powered Sling aircraft from The Aircraft Factory, the AVMAP Navigation and engine monitoring system, and the Rotax powered Tucano Experimental and Light-Sport Aircraft.
ROTALK NEWS Episode 4
ROTAX's 915iS-powered Aquila A211 test aircraft, the Scheibe SF-25C Falke (first-ever 912-equipped aircraft!) and ROTAX factory in Gunskirchen, Austria.
ROTALK NEWS Episode 3
Michael Smith's Rotax-Powered Searey Circumnavigation, the amazing Rotax-Powered Lockwood Aircam and Anthony Caere's chimpanzee rescue operations.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. This decision can be reversed.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.