fbpx

 

Hi guys, we are a group having an UL aircraft fitted with a 2003 912ULS. We purchased the aircraft in 2018 but back in 2016 the aircraft was fitted with a new Helix H50F 175 cm 3 blade propeller, a change from a 2 blade propeller. The propeller is part of the listed propellers in the Gerätekennblatt from 2003 and is listed with max. propeller rpm of 2020 (2,43x) i.e. 4900 rpm on the engine, indications are although more close to 4700 rpm. Looking at the rpm specifications in the OM for the 912ULS this seems to be very low. Is that healthy for the engine ?

  • Re: RPM and choice of propel

    by » 3 weeks ago


    In the absence of the experts;

    Check out the Rotax Operators Manual, (OM) for your engine:

    Go to top of this Forum page;

    Select; Suport/Bulletins - Engine Manuals - Current Engines - Engine Type (912ULS) - Document Type OM - (scroll down) - click on Search Database - click on Downloads.

    You will find all the information, relevant to your engine operation, in this document.

    In general, you should not operate your engine below 5200 rpm, under load ( ie TO & Climb). 

    😈

     


  • Re: RPM and choice of propel

    by » 3 weeks ago


    Hi Mads

    Good advice from Sean, get the Rotax data from the manuals.  In general you need to achieve, for fixed pitch, near to your maximum continuous RPM in straight and level flight.  As pointed out in a normal climb at WOT you should try to see peak torque, 5200, from the engine.  

    The question then is, was the 4700 RPM from your data static or in climb? If it is a static, ground run, setting the aircraft would have to unload the RPM by its forward airspeed to see what you can get on climb.  The aircraft would need to be a very slippery one and have a fast speed on the climb.  

    Cheers


    Thank you said by: Sean Griffin

  • Re: RPM and choice of propel

    by » 2 weeks ago


    Don't overlook calibrating the tacho. If it's the ordinary Rotax one a 200rpm error is quite feasible in my experience.


You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.